A quote from a news site on the web: "A flock of small jets took flight from Washington Thursday, each carrying a Democratic presidential candidate to South Carolina for the first debate of the political season. For Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama, Chris Dodd and Joe Biden, it was wheels up shortly after they voted in favor of legislation requiring that U.S. troops begin returning home from Iraq in the fall. No one jet pooled, no one took commercial flights to save money, fuel or emissions." Click HERE for the story.

I guess they're not worried about their global warming myth! Ah yes... do as I say, not as I do!

From the financial sectors, specifically the Financial Times (click HERE for the article), we read that all these "carbon credits" that Al Gore (and pals) have been pushing yield few, if any, environmental benefits at all.

In investigation undertaken by FT has revealed that these "credits" are (ready for this?) worthless. The "green gold rush" is generating a lot of money for the companies selling them, but they in turn are doing little in return. This is what we used to call "a scam".

The market for these "credits" is projected to reach over 65 BILLION DOLLARS by 2010. Yes, 65 BILLION. This is companies, individuals, organizations sending 65 BILLION dollars with "companies" that sell "carbon credits" and return... what? WHAT? Nothing but good feelings?

What is so upsetting is that 65 BILLION dollars could go towards a lot of really good children's programs, healthcare, research, tax returns, food for the needy, shelters for battered women, medicine for Africa, churches, new city streets, and I could go on.

You must know that Al Gore's company is a leader in this endeavor. In my opinion, this is a criminal fleecing of millions of ignorant but do-gooder Americans.

Want to know what's behind Global Warming? This is it.

It just gets more and MORE astounding. Now, a group of individuals claiming to be British climate scientists (names please?)and a person named Bob Ward, claiming to be a previous spokesperson for the British Royal Society, are demanding absolute dictatorial censorship rights over what is released into the public domain.

This group claims that "The Great Global Warming Swindle", a documentary aired on British television, is in error because it is critical of Al Gore's movie "An Inconvenient Truth". "The Great Global Warming Swindle" counters that it is not humans that are causing any perceived warming but more likely the sun and/or cycles we do not yet understand.

In an open letter sent Tuesday by these 38 so-called scientists, including the former heads of Britain's academy of sciences and Britain's weather office, called on the producers of "The Great Global Warming Swindle" to remove anything critical of Al Gore's movie - tantamount to direct censorship.

Bob Ward states, "Free speech does not extend to misleading the public by making factually inaccurate statements," he said. "Somebody has to stand up for the public interest here."

The producer of the "The Great Global Warming Swindle" responded with, "This is a contemptible, weasel-worded attempt to gag scientific criticism, and it won't work. I don't believe they're interested in quality control when it comes to the reporting of science -- so long as it's on their side."

As might have been expected from Royal Society, any disagreement with them is beginning to be deemed heresy. The book burnings and hangings are soon at hand for anyone that might disagree with these outright socialists. For a country with cold and greasy food, puny cars, spiked blue hair styles, Carl Marx on a pedestal, pins through their cheeks, and one of the highest illiteracy rates in the modern world, it seems to make sense that their unimpressive scientists would chant HERESY HERESY HERESY! If your life was miserable, wouldn't you love company too?

Opinion: I think it all goes back to this misguided belief that the United States is the wayward children of the UK. For the years that I lived there (in the UK) there was always this mean-spirited opinion that we (the US) were the children that had gone bad. After all, we were THEIR 13 colonies at one time. I loved the old crusty blokes and they bought me plenty of ale at the pubs... but the generations since have always held us in nothing but contempt. Figures. And so... as they say... misery loves company.

Click HERE for the story

One enduring aspect of our existence here on Earth that seems to be consistently overlooked is the simple FACT that nothing in nature is static. Nothing. Yet this is exactly what Al Gore, Sheryl Crow, hoards of Hollow-wood stars and starlets, and the liberal media would have you believe - all things are naturally static and that any change in that must have been brought about by humans. Usually this "change" is given an evil connotation... something "bad" we are doing. For example, any change in climate is "caused by man" and is "bad". Or, how about this take: change is the result of George Bush or Carl Rove - and is bad bad bad.

Try this take: "Hi, my name is Dr. Cullen from the Weather Channel and I'm the Chief Climatologist here and although my undergraduate degree was in Religion, I have no Masters Degree, and my Doctorate is from a matchbook certificate mill (and perhaps my daddy is rich and knows Al Gore) I am now on the Weather Channel to TELL YOU THAT YOU WILL DIE from global warming." Yeah, right. She goes on to discredit REAL scientists who discount her wild and hysterical claims. Smooth move Weather Channel. Say, I have a dog that barks when it rains... how about hiring him as an expert too!

There are cycles and events which are ordinary, expected, and necessary to life on Earth. Pick up a Historical Geology book and see for yourself (Oh yeah, I forgot, whats a book... duh!). Many of these cycles are not yet understood or even known. So how then can anyone accurately model our climate? They can't. This is why the weatherman or lady is wrong about the weather NEXT WEEK despite using the best NOAA supercomputers and models. We do not know enough, period.

So along comes a recent discovery. Astronomers have known this for ages... Our Sun moves toward and away from the Milky Way’s center, and also up and down through the galactic plane. One complete up-and-down cycle takes 64 million years. This cycle is recently discovered to be suspiciously like Earth’s biodiversity cycle. See graph.



This biodiversity cycle seems to coincide with the Sun’s galactic travels and cycles.
Now to be sure, "biodiversity" is a tame word that really means wild weather, the extinction of many species, increased radiation and hazards from space, changes in the way the sun affects the earth, and on and on. In short, hazardous times for small animals. This is just ONE more cycle, natural cycle, that the Earth experiences.

Yet, small minded actors, singers, politicians insist that is it US that must truly be at the center of the universe and the cause of all the things they cannot fathom. Talk about medieval thinking, at best.

Click HERE for a recent article about this very topic.

"The Belgian astronomer Jean Meeus has pointed out a peculiar distinction of the coming winters. Because of the perturbations of the earth's orbit, the lengths of the seasons are changing. In particular, the duration of winter (from December solstice to March equinox) is gradually decreasing. In A.D. 1000 it was 89.47 days; it will be 88.99 days in A.D. 2000 and 88.74 in A.D. 3000. The minimum will be about the year 3500, and thereafter the durations will increase.
Mr. Meeus notes that the 1970-71 winter lasted 89d Oh 2m, and that next winter will last 88d 23h 58™. Thus 1971-72 will be the first astronomical winter in several thousand years to have a duration of less than 89 days." ["Shorter Winters" Sky & Telescope, June 1971, 343.]

With all following winters to be shorter. Due to the Earth's orbit. Not SUVs or Humans. Chalk another one up for SCIENCE!

Typical hypocrisy. Blatant hypocrisy. Arrogant hypocrisy.
Do as we tell you - but leave US alone. Yes, that sums up Sheryl Crow's latest Hollow-Wood rant.

Just as Sheryl and movie producer pal Laurie David were assaulting (of all people) Carl Rove for global warming (click HERE) , Sheryl herself continues to use up an enormous amount of energy while charging YOU hundreds of thousands of dollars for the privilege of watching her use up thousands of kilowatts and thousands of gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel. All pollutants, as they themselves describe it.

As you can see from Sheryl Crow's "must have" requirements for each show she does (which also uses up an enormous amount of electricity), she employs buses, tractor trailers, cars, food, and well... look for yourself. Click HERE.

So, as she demands the finest wines, liquors, vehicles, electrical power and fuel, and an armada of vehicles burning up resources while polluting the air - she assaults Carl Rove over the need for us COMMON PEONS to start using a single sheet of toilet paper in the bathroom. How arrogant. How dishonest. How vile.

Wake UP America!!

You cannot make this up. You cannot even get wildly drunk and burp this stuff up. You cannot even go to the Amazon, chug mushrooms, and then dream this stuff up. It is beyond any rational thought at all.

Yet... here it is.

CQ CQ, Can you hear me Earthlings?

Yesterday, Kevin Hennessy, a lead scientist (?) with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), said that "media attention" on scientists that were skeptical of "global warming" damages the consensus that now exists about global warming.

Further, he charged that any media attention on scientific skeptics only serves prolong useless debate and keeps the "controversy boiling".

He continues, incredibly, to say: "a balanced view does not always reflect the consensus of the research community", and is therefore a bad thing.

Oh - My - God! I am not making this up. Read this again. Read and think about what he just revealed. Click HERE and read a news article about it.

Mr. Hennessy is complaining that climate reporting is "TOO BALANCED". OH MY GOD.

He is insane. Hennessy is literally insane. How can a real scientist even make statements like this?

I am, literally without words now. This takes the cake. The dark madness is amongst us.

You knew it was coming. It would only be a matter of time before A LOT of people (and scientists) had to cover their behinds over their grave predictions two years ago that they had absolute proof that the 2006 hurricane season would be the worst ever - and all because of Global Warming. And of course, we now know, in 2007, that their dire predictions of doom were 100% wrong. Not a little wrong, but 100% wrong. Not a SINGLE hurricane came ashore in the whole of the 2006 season.

So, I guess you should have expected this latest news article as the Global Warming Psychos (GWP) are undeterred by the facts.

Here it is.

Reuters (of course) has a news article out this morning proclaiming that Global Warming now suddenly INHIBITS hurricanes. They claim that wind sheer, from Global Warming, is responsible for the LACK of hurricanes in 2006. Hey, maybe this only works this way on even numbered years? Yeah, that's the ticket! Click HERE for this most amazing and psychotic bit of news. A sudden and complete 180 degree prediction change from 2004.

Doesn't anyone consider this a sign that maybe we have no clue what we're talking about with this and that maybe, out of prudence, we should study this (and not just 1-2 years either) before leaping to doom and gloom predictions?

What amazes me is how these deranged mental midgets can keep ascribing EVERYTHING (even conflicting facts) to Global Warming. The key here is that THEY WANT IT SO BADLY TO BE TRUE that they can't even think clearly or straight. This is truly scary.

I think, in my book, I agree with Michael Savage when he mourns publicly that half the nation (and maybe the world) is, essentially, mentally ill. It isn't their fault, it just is. Or, as other suggest, this is the invisible hand of communism at work. Either way, it's ghastly.

"Planck Time" clarification.

I am all in favor of conservation, I am all in favor of using resources wisely, I am all in favor of doing reasonable things to keep the environment clean and to act responsibly for our children's sake.

On the other hand: I loath the hypocrisy demonstrated by Al Gore and most activist Hollow-Wood movies stars. I loath the hysteria whipped up by do-gooder fools that think they know what is occurring. I loath our educational system in that is it failing us and our children (and this includes parental failure when they emphasis sports over science, or perhaps emphasis nothing at all). I loath scientists that promote global warming because they are political activists, have an agenda, or are chasing grant money. And brother, there are tons of them... they all want a BMW too.

With that said... what a shame that common sense FLEW RIGHT PAST the witless people that were staging global warming protests (now there's a release of hot air for you) this weekend but had to battle the snows and frigid temperatures. Click HERE, and HERE.



Please, don't tell me these people didn't notice how absurd they were!! It's 14 days to May and they're marching in freezing conditions protesting global warming. Folks, I couldn't make this stuff up if I had tried...

Art Bell, for those that aren't familiar, much like Al Gore, claims the Earth is boiling away. Unfortunately, for reason's sake, Art Bell has a nighttime radio broadcast that reaches millions of listeners (called "Coast To Coast" on AM radio).

Among Art's usual guests are individuals that claim to "Remote View" a million years into the future, travel through time backwards and forwards, talk to ghosts, travel to UFO motherships courtesy of the "Grays", and are experts of global warming. Most notably, one gentleman named Richard Hoagland lays claims that he is the "Coast to Coast Science Adviser" and makes multiple appearances on the radio show. Mr. Hoagland claims he was awarded science medals, was Carl Sagan's adviser, and writes for Walter Cronkite. None of this is verifiable (ref: Click HERE). However, you get a feel for the kinds of guests and the flavor of the show.

Of course, just like Al Gore, Art too wrote a book called the "Coming Global Superstorm", which he states is the seed for the movie "The Day After". Art also believes in something called "the quickening". Somehow, all of this involves his assertions that global warming is real and we're all going to die and, well, it's all our fault. As you know, Art is a radio talk show host without any scientific training or education. He selectively allows his guests to mimic and bolster his own theories.

Last night, Mr. Bell had yet another "real scientist" on his show affirming that "GLOBAL WARMING WAS REAL and UNDENIABLE"; a statement she kept repeating like a mantra. Despite little proof, despite only her own opinions, this researcher named Dr. Brenda Ekwurzel continued to state "GLOBAL WARMING WAS REAL and UNDENIABLE". You an check a brief bio about here, click here. She is essentially a hydrologist and without doubt knows her stuff in that field. Yet how she suddenly becomes an EXPERT in weather and atmospheric climatology is a stretch. And she continued to discount the research and opinions of REAL Meteorologists, Atmospheric Physicists, and Atmospheric Climatologists that had 50 times her experience. As only a lowly associate professor teaching college, Dr. Ekwurzel immediately threw out the life's work of major players in the field (many you've read about in this blog) with her continued mantra: "GLOBAL WARMING WAS REAL and UNDENIABLE". She essentially did nothing more than promote science by consensus without having done any of her own original research into global warming.

Typical of Art Bell to bring us this kind of garbage.

And of course... Dr. Ekwurzel was one of the LEADING OUTSPOKEN scientists who swore up and down that we were all going to die from "killer Hurricanes" in the 2006 season. Check this article here. As we ALL know now, that never happened. As a matter of fact, reality threw a pie in her face. NO HURRICANES came into the US at all in 2006. Hysteria - plain and simple hysteria. from a young scientist that really doesn't know squat! Or has an agenda.

Oh yes... she is also a member of the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). A radical arm of Greenpeace (?).

So once again, Mr. Bell (whose life is shrouded in controversy with the recent and strange death of his wife and his almost immediate marriage then to a 19 year old Philippine child) has brought us more pseudo-science and garbage on the air waves. Much akin to what Imus has done, only in the world of "science and fact".

Scientists busy studying the Earth's climate, at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in California, have found a direct historical link between climate changes and the output of the sun. Historical records were kept by the Egyptians of the height of the Nile River every year. Because the Nile played such an important part in their daily lives, the record keeping was precise and accurate.

Drs. Alexander Ruzmaikin and Joan Feynman along with Dr. Yuk Yung of the California Institute of Technology examined Nile water level records that were collected between 622 and 1470 A.D., in Cairo. "Since the time of the pharaohs, the water levels of the Nile were accurately measured, since they were critically important for agriculture and the preservation of temples in Egypt," said Dr. Feynman.

In a seemingly unrelated bit of history, it was discovered that accurate records exist for auroral activity during the same exact time period in northern Europe and the Far East. "People there routinely and carefully observed and recorded auroral activity, because auroras were believed to portend future disasters, such as droughts and the deaths of kings", said Dr. Feynman. "A great deal of modern scientific effort has gone into collecting these ancient auroral records, inter-comparing them and evaluating their accuracy," Dr. Ruzmaikin added.

When comparing the two sets of data... they found something amazing. They found a clear link between the historical records of the Nile river levels and the intensity of the aurora. Or stated more simply: a definite historical link exists between the sun and the Earth's climate. Further analysis yields what appears to be two distinct, and repeating solar variability cycles: one with a period of 88 years, and another with a period of 200 years.

How does this affect climate? The JPL scientists believe that variations in the output of the sun's ultraviolet energy causes changes in the climate pattern referred to as the "Northern Annular Mode" - a pattern that affects Northern Hemisphere weather and the way in which air travels over the Atlantic Ocean. It appears that during cycles of high solar activity, the "North Atlantic Oscillation's influence extends to the Indian Ocean." This in turn affects air temperature distribution which then influences air circulation and rainfall at the Nile River's sources. Subsequently, one can imagine that these effects are more widespread than to merely change the amount of rainfall and temperature over half of the globe.

However, no matter how hard we examine Egyptian history concerning this, we still cannot find any references to SUV's, FACTORIES, POPULATION ISSUES, or REPUBLICANS anywhere. It is interesting to note that cycles and high impact variations are still being discovered. Should this then not throw all the climate models, currently in use, right out the window (With Mr. Al "nino" Gore)?

Click HERE for the NASA JPL Story

Doctor Richard S. Lindzen is the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. And he has a message. He says, "Recently many people have said that the earth is facing a crisis requiring urgent action. This statement has nothing to do with science."

Dr. Lindzen continues, "There is no compelling evidence that the warming trend we've seen will amount to anything close to catastrophe. What most commentators—and many scientists—seem to miss is that the only thing we can say with certainly about climate is that it changes."

Hard as that is to believe, I think, I recall that mid-west farmers have always said, "The weather just is." One day it's cold, the next day, it's warm. The only constant is that the weather is changing constantly, I think to myself after hearing his words.

Dr. Lindzen, unmoved by my observation, continues, "The current alarm rests on the false assumption not only that we live in a perfect world, temperaturewise, but also that our warming forecasts for the year 2040 are somehow more reliable than the weatherman's forecast for next week." And of course, I know this, and he knows this... but there does seem to be a lot of people unwilling to look at this with anything other that outright "screaming in the street" hysteria.

How can this be so difficult to understand, I think aloud? Then, I remember. We've become a nation of idiots glued to American Idol and hanging on every word about Anna-Nicole Smith, and more interested in basketball than science.

Dr. Lindzen confirms my thoughts by stating, "Many of the most alarming studies rely on long-range predictions using inherently untrustworthy climate models, similar to those that cannot accurately forecast the weather a week from now." Of course I suddenly realize that if the weatherman can't predict the weather next week with any accuracy - using the latest and greatest supercomputers - then how the hell is he guessing the weather in 200 years?

And all this activity by Al Gore's brain-dead zealots; maybe it's harmless I wonder. No says Dr. Lindzen, "actions taken thus far to reduce emissions have already had negative consequences without improving our ability to adapt to climate change. An emphasis on ethanol, for instance, has led to angry protests against corn-price increases in Mexico, and forest clearing and habitat destruction in Southeast Asia."

But what about the Kyoto Treaty I ask? Again, Dr. Lindzen stares at me and explains, "Enron was a leading lobbyist for Kyoto because it had hoped to capitalize on emissions trading." So... as I feared and suspected, this whole thing is about money. Now it makes sense and why it's being pushed so hard by Al and his pals. Money. Money. Money.

So, is there really a debate about Global Warming? Dr. Lindzen will tell you NO, because there is no global warming. And if someone tells you that he really doesn't know what he is talking about, well, just remember that he is the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. And uh... Al Gore isn't any of that.

Please read this Newsweek article by clicking here

You know of Dr. William Gray from my last blog. Now, let us examine his most outspoken critic: Kerry Emanuel.

Compare the Wiki entries for both and tell me who has the most prestigious and influential career?

Dr. William Gray: Click Here
Kerry Emanuel: Click Here


Dr. William Gray's web page: Click Here
Kerry Emanuel's Web Page: Click Here


Dr. William Gray: Not a friend of Al Gore.
Kerry Emanuel: Friend of Al Gore and in line for more grant money.

You decide.

Dr. William Gray, an emeritus professor at the Atmospheric Science Department at Colorado State University is the the world's most respected and accurate hurricane prediction scientist and has been studying hurricanes for over 50 years. He has been THE most accurate storm climatologist for a quarter of a century and he singularly pioneered hurricane forecasting.

Click here for Dr. Gray's Meteorology Site

On Friday, April 7, Dr. Gray called Mr. Al Gore "a gross alarmist." Dr. Gray continued, "He's one of these guys that preaches the end of the world type of things. I think he's doing a great disservice and he doesn't know what he's talking about," Dr. William Gray said in an interview with The Associated Press at the National Hurricane Conference in New Orleans. Click HERE for that story.

Dr. Gray completely disagrees with the political view that heat-trapping gases generated by human activity are causing the world to warm. Click HERE for the Wiki entry. Dr. Gary states there is no evidence at all that hurricanes are increasing in intensity or frequency. We have also presented that evidence (not merely hearsay or alarmist nonsense from Al Gore) on these Blog pages ourselves some months ago. To wit: last year (2006) we had ZERO hurricanes hit the US. (It's a left and then a crushing right jab to the jaw of Al Gore's crooked logic... a TKO and the crowd roars).

Bundle up, it's cold outside.

Sub freezing temperatures, in April, are devastating the peach trees and strawberry patches across Georgia. Crops and blossoms across the eastern US are facing huge levels of damage as a result of these record smashing cold temperatures.

These are record smashing cold temperatures hitting the deep south - it has NEVER BEEN this cold in the deep south at this time of year. This is not made up rhetoric. Go outside without your coat and tell me how correct Al Gore is now! Folks, use your common sense! There is NO Global Warming!

Click HERE for Record Cold News

Other news... Third day of the Masters in Augusta, Georgia, and they're wearing arctic parkas. Click HERE for that story.

Record Cold temperatures smashing previous records! "Quote: The National Weather Service was predicting record lows Sunday for parts of the Southeast and Midwest, and an unseasonably cold weekend for much of the Northeast. Snow was forecast in parts of Ohio, Michigan and New England"

Click HERE for the original story

A test for those still possessing Common Sense: What is the opposite of Global Warming? Answer: COLD! It is 53 days to June - and look at this COLD COLD COLD.

It's April 6, 2007, about seven weeks until June. But, it's 20 degrees outside and we have 4 inches of snow in Central Ohio. All the blossoms are once again killed off by the cold - the fruit trees will not bear fruit. Just like last year. Folks - take a good close look at Al Gore's Global Warming!

You know who Al Gore is, right? You know what channel American Idol is on, right? You know all about Anna Nicole, right? You know about Global Warming, right? But, do you know what the Upper Pleistocene refers to, or what the Wurm Ice Age is about? Hmmm... that's exactly what I was afraid of.

OK boys and girls... here's a real simple chart (you can click on it to make it bigger):


Notice that wiggly line... thats the temperature of the Earth. I added the red dotted line to show that even IF our temperatures go UP, we have a ways to go before we hit NORMAL. Normally pretty hot and sweltering on this here planet... and look at that, we've just emerged from a series of ice ages (Wurm). And what do you know, it was quite a bit warmer (than now) about 15000 years ago. You can see things cooled off quite rapidly after that period. Which is why you'll only hear about how it's been slowly warming for the last 10000 years... true but not the WHOLE REAL story.

The FIRST THING that should grab your attention is the VARIABILITY and CYCLIC NATURE of temperature - and I can promise you (unlike Al Gore) that there were NO SUV's, FACTORYS, POWER PLANTS, OR BIG CITIES in the Interglacial Ages. This proves, without a doubt, that HUMANS have nothing to DO with any global mean temperatures in any meaningful way. Bottom line: it's been hotter, it's been colder, for lot longer than we can imagine - and you and I had NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.

The source for this graph: Dunbar, C., and Waage, K. M., 1969, Historical Geology [3rd ed.]: New York, Wiley, p434.

You can educate yourself too for 34 cents. click here.

Here is a mean temperature chart of Alaska, for the last 100 years, as presented by the International Arctic Research Center. Note: we're to assume that they've been religiously measuring the temperatures and tracking them without bias.

Now... here is the mean temperature chart of Alaska, for the last 100 years, as presented by some dudes that live across the street. Note: they too drew a nice colored line on the graph indicating that there is an over general trend that you're supposed to believe:


The problem with this kind of quack data, as presented by either group is that 1) we don't know if or how the measuring equipment was calibrated, 2) We don't know who or what methodology was employed in the process of measuring the temperature, 3) We don't know where the measurements were taken - if taken IN Fairbanks, we haven't adjusted for the growth and thermal output of the city itself and it's effects on the immediate environment, and 4) The graph trend discounts what may have come before - say, in the previous 100 years. Actually, both trends are correct.. but it depends upon the time scale that the average encompasses.

A MOST accurate and truthful average temperature, using my most advanced climatological modeling software, and using only the visible data points, results in the following graph (and I don't have a political agenda unlike most recipients of grant money, or liberals in general):


The Bottom Line? The data implied by the International Arctic Research Center is pure NONSENSE. It implies that the average temperature of Fairbanks, Alaska was 0 degrees F around 900 A.D.; and in the whopping cold temperatures of about -20F range at the time of Christ. Pure BS! This clearly is not in our historical or geological records.

It must be that Al Gore is holding his thermometer upside down... Alaska is reporting RECORD COLD temperatures for March 2007. This from the "Monthly Weather Summary of Alaska" by the Alaskan Climate Research Station at The Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks . Quote: "Strong and widespread cold described March this year all across Alaska. Temperatures throughout the mainland were more than 8°F below average and the most extreme temperature departures of more than 16°F below average were observed in the central Interior." Click HERE for the Source.

I guess they didn't get the Al Gore Memo about disregarding their scientific instruments.

Folks, this is solid scientific evidence. This is not hearsay from an attactive Hollow-wood starlet. You will not hear the truth from Al Gore.

This week, the highest court in the land decided, by a five to four margin, that carbon dioxide is a pollutant. Yes, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that CO2... the very same gas that all plant life on Earth requires... is now bad bad bad and is nothing more than a nasty pollutant.

Sadly, there can be no higher level of "science by consensus". We have reached the pinnacle. The day that politically appointed lawyers dictate what science is and isn't, and what atmospheric gas is "good" and what is "bad", is the day we are quite literally "finished" as an educated society. It can only get worse and go downhill from here.

The court has charged the EPA with the task of 'cleaning the air' of carbon dioxide. To the EPA's credit, they previously refused to categorize (rightly so) CO2 as a pollutant - hence the affirmative action by the court.

Click HERE for a supporting article


For those unaware... the currently existing levels of CO2 are rather minuscule. I've provided a diagram to demonstrate how much CO2 actually exists in comparison to other gases (such as Argon, Nitrogen, Xenon, etc).

Yes, you can click on this for a bigger picture!

Gasp... look at that nasty Nitrogen!! OK ok, just kidding. But this gives you a feel for what we're talking about.

Carbon dioxide a pollutant? Next they'll be decreeing that oxygen is an oxidizer and is causing us all to rust away. I would have been hard pressed to imagine this kind of madness 20 years ago. Back when schools used to teach science and students actually flunked if they failed their tests.

The May edition of Vanity Fair has an article about Leonardo DiCaprio's activist insights and his upcoming film "The 11th Hour", or "We're All Screwed So Give Me Your Money", or "You People Are Repulsive Insects And You'd Better Listen To Me Because I Am An Actor And You Are Not", or was it "My Head Is So Big I Cannot Fit Through The Door And I Pretend To Be Smart Because I Recite Scripts That Others Have Written For Me and I Even Have A Director Telling Me How To Do It Because Basically I'm Rather Useless In The Big Scheme Of Things But You Sure Don't Know That And You Give Me Millions Of Your Dollars - Chumps". Or something along those lines.

Essentially, we're going to be treated to another self-indulgent "We're All Doomed Because of You" movie that will be full of emotion but lacking any scientific substance. Another "science by consensus" sermon.

And along comes Vanity Fair - trumpeting this event like the next coming.

In the article, Leo describes himself as an eco-activist, and he has lots of money, so therefore he is correct (so the twisted logic runs). And since I've just collapsed the gist of the article into one sentence, you can see that I too am amazing in my skills and activist abilities. And I'm smarter and better looking too.

Leo, describing his movie, states "So, we find ourselves on the brink." Personally, I really wish he would stop looking into the mirror and thinking that he is seeing the universe in all it's glory. And stop using the "we" word when he looks at himself. It creeps me out.

He continues "The Hour Is Near". Wow... I've heard preachers use this term. Folks, can you see the parallels here to some new age religion? This is not by accident.

He then continues to say that "It's clear humans have had a devastating impact on our planet's ecological web of life." I note that here again is this 'humans are bad' theme. And again, I call out for Leo to "lead by example"! Put his money where his mouth is and just simply eliminate himself. Show us the way Leo, please lead, please become the martyr for us.

Un-fazed by my plea, Leo continues: "Because we've turned our backs on nature's warning signs, and because our political and corporate leaders have consistently ignored the overwhelming scientific evidence, the challenges we face are that much more difficult."

And here again is science by "movie star consensus". Is there anything more dangerous our egotistical as this? I think not.

As a regular reader of this column, you will have seen entry after entry pointing to some of the world's top scientists stating that global warming is nonsense. This includes their direct quotes and pointers to their body of evidence.

So... it comes down to this: How gullible are you?

Click Here for the Vanity Fair article

Amazing. Politically appointed judges (The US Supreme Court) ruled Monday that the Environmental Protection Agency must consider greenhouse gases as pollutants.

Judges, not scientists, are now mandating science fact. Welcome to the Dark Ages.

Click here for this unreal story

"LOOK OVER THE DESCRIPTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING TWO HOUSES AND SEE IF YOU CAN TELL WHICH BELONGS TO AN ENVIRONMENTALIST

HOUSE # 1:

A 20-room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guest house all heated by gas.

In ONE MONTH ALONE this mansion consumes more energy than the average American household in an ENTIRE YEAR. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2,400.00 per month. In natural gas alone (which last time we checked was a fossil fuel), this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not in a northern or Midwestern "snow belt," either. It's in the South.

HOUSE # 2:

Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university, this house incorporates every "green" feature current home construction can provide. The house contains only 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on arid high prairie in the American Southwest.

A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat pumps drawing groundwater through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F.) heats the house in winter and cools it in summer. The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas, and it consumes 25% of the electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system.

Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Flowers and shrubs native to the area blend the property into the surrounding rural landscape.

HOUSE # 1 (20 room energy guzzling mansion) is outside of Nashville,Tennessee. It is the abode of that renowned environmentalist (and filmmaker) Al Gore.

HOUSE # 2 (4 BR 4000 sq.ft.model eco-friendly house) is on a ranch near Crawford, Texas, also known as "the Texas White House," it is the private residence of the President of the United States, George W. Bush.

So whose house is gentler on the environment?